Search  
Thursday, February 09, 2012 ..:: Prof. Table Talk ::.. Register  Login
Site Navigation

Article Details
The Siege of Vienna 1529 - By Paul Robinson

Paul Robinson discusses what might have happened if Suleiman were successful in his campaign against Vienna...


The Augsburg Confession might not have been written if the spring of 1529 had not been unusually wet in southeastern Europe. Until the Diet of Augsburg in 1530, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V had failed to move effectively against the Lutheran princes. He had been unable to enforce the edict of Worms or to form a consensus among the princes of the Empire concerning religious questions. Although the Emperor had not failed for lack of trying, his attention was divided in the late 1520s between the Lutherans, war with France in the west, and the threat of an attack by the Ottoman Turks in the southeast. The 1529 Peace of Cambrai suspended Charles V’s rivalry with the French king, Francis I. In the same year, the unsuccessful siege of Vienna by the Ottoman Turkish Sultan Suleiman I (the Magnificent) marked the end of an immediate Ottoman threat to the Empire.

Had Suleiman been able to move his heavy artillery into position, Vienna might have fallen. If Vienna had been taken, Charles V would have had to move against the Ottomans immediately and, in all likelihood, would have postponed action against the Lutherans for the sake of unity in the Empire against an external foe. As it was, rumor of another Turkish attempt on Vienna put battle plans high on the list of topics for the Diet of Augsburg. Martin Luther, in a letter from Coburg in April 1530, wrote, “It is said that the Turk has promised, or rather threatened, to return to Germany next year with very great forces, even leading against us large numbers of Tartars” (LW 49:286). But Charles did not face a victorious Ottoman host because the rain-soaked roads kept Suleiman’s largest guns out of the battle.

Charles V’s brother, Ferdinand I, had inherited the battle with the Ottoman Empire along with the title King of Hungary when the former king, Lajos II, was killed by the Turks in the battle of Mohács in 1526. After that battle, Hungary was partially conquered by the Turks, who then turned their attention toward Austria. Suleiman moved toward Vienna from Ottoman-controlled Bulgaria in the spring of 1529 with an army of about 100,000 men and 500 artillery pieces. (The number of troops engaged in battles during this time period is notoriously difficult to determine. Contemporary sources routinely exaggerate the numbers and also fail to account for casualties and noncombatants in the opposing forces. The numbers given here represent a consensus of modern scholarship.) As the Ottoman forces advanced, the rains poured down and the roads were soon all but impassable. Camels broke their legs in the muck and had to be slaughtered, and about two hundred of the heaviest artillery pieces were sent back. Without his largest cannon, Suleiman was forced to change his tactics before even reaching Vienna. He would have to rely on his miners rather than his guns to breach the city walls.

Meanwhile, Vienna braced for the Ottoman onslaught. Ferdinand I left the city when pleas for help addressed to his brother, Charles V, went unanswered. Nicholas, Graf von Salm, a 70-year-old professional soldier, was left to command the Viennese forces of approximately 20,000 men and 75 guns. Nicholas set about preparing the city for a siege—repairing walls, building fortifications, stockpiling supplies, and tearing flammable shingles from roofs.

Battle was joined in September when the 300 guns remaining with Suleiman’s forces opened fire on the city. The bombardment had little effect, however, since these were smaller caliber pieces that could be dragged through the mud. Suleiman knew that these cannon would never breach the walls of Vienna, and soon the Viennese defenders found out that the bombardment was meant only as a cover for the beginning of the Turkish mining operation. Mining was an ancient means of taking down a castle tower or a portion of wall. Miners would begin digging a tunnel well behind the lines of the besieging army, and when the tunnel reached the area to be destroyed, the miners would dig a cavern that was held up by wooden supports. Then the cavern would either be set on fire or kegs of gunpowder would be exploded in it. In either case, when the wooden supports were destroyed, the wall or tower would fall into the pit and troops would rush into the resulting breach in the defenses.

Nicholas, commander of the Viennese forces, had bowls of water and dried peas placed around the inside of the city walls. When ripples appeared in the water or the peas shook, the defenders would know that Turkish miners were near. They would then dig their own mines from within the city to intercept those of the enemy. Six large tunnels were discovered in this way. Battle was joined underground between the rival groups of miners, and several Turkish powder kegs were seized by the Viennese. Eventually the Turks succeeded in creating a minor breach at the Salt Gate and a larger one at the Carinthian gate, but in both cases the Turkish assault forces were driven back by the defenders.

Overall, however, the Turkish mining was having little effect. In addition, Viennese artillery mounted on the city rooftops began to take a toll on the Turkish army. On October 14 the Ottomans mounted what would prove to be a final assault. Although the Turks succeeded in exploding another mine, their infantry was cut down by cannon fire and hand-thrown bombs, and the defenders drove them from the walls of the city. The Turks returned to their camp, packed their goods, and were gone by the next morning. The siege of Vienna was over. (Martin Luther recounted what he had heard of the end of the siege in a letter to Nicholas von Amsdorf. LW 49:240–43)

Suleiman attempted to conquer Vienna again in 1532 but failed even to reach the city, contenting himself with raiding in Styria. The most famous Turkish attack on Vienna came in 1683. The Turks were turned back on that occasion by the King of Poland, Jan Sobieski—a defeat that marked the beginning of the end of the Turkish Empire. A resident of Vienna, Georg Franz Kolschitzky, also played a role in defeating the besieging army and, according to legend, was rewarded for his service with the sacks of coffee left behind by the Turkish invaders. Kolschitzky became one of the first men to successfully run a coffeehouse in Vienna.

Written By: host
Date Posted: 11/16/2006
Number of Views: 789


Comments
12/2/2006 6:06:39 AM

Interesting article, wet roads, etc., the Lord does work through earthly means.

You must be logged in to submit a comment.

Return
  

Copyright 2006 by Concordia Seminary - St. Louis   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement